Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 03:13
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
What’s next?
As measles spreads across the Americas, outbreaks in Mexico and Canada have also turned deadly - CNN
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Weaponizing Tariffs: Top Stocks For The Summer Heat - Seeking Alpha
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Let’s just make it real clear:
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
JPMorgan’s Jamie Dimon Sees Bond Market Crack — Why And What To Do - Forbes
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Thank you.
Are rich people harder workers than poor people as a whole?
Russia can stop this any time.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
How does the brain decide "what" thought to attach to a feeling?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Who are the most controversial members of BTS besides Jimin?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Just in the last 5 years:
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Ground beef sold at Whole Foods might be contaminated with E. coli, USDA warns - CNN